Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘book’


What a horrible blogger I am!  I feel like it has been months since I have written on this blog.  I have spent all of my time writing on my self-absorbed weight loss blog talking about myself and my gastric by-pass surgery.  I have completely neglected this blog and my other writing obligations.  Just a quick note, the surgery went well.  I have lost 71 pounds.  I have been writing quite a bit.

I owe my friend Jeff Miller a review of his book, The Bubble Gum Thief.  I need to post my 2013 writing goals.  I also want to talk about some of the other non-diet-blog writing I have been doing.

In this post, I am going to talk about my 2013 writing goals and about some of my other writing.  You see, my writer’s group asks each of us to create goals for the new year and to be specific.  We cannot just say, “write more,”  we have to set specific goals to show what “writing more” looks like.  The only thing I did not finish last year was to finish my children’s novel.  I am giving myself to Chinese New Year’s though, so I could still make it.  (see what I did there?)

Writing Goals for 2013:

  • Submit writing, short stories, essays, etc to four contests or other publications.
  • Finish children’s novel, which is almost done and hanging in limbo.
  • Write, finish, edit 12 personal essays.
  • Blog on both writing blog and weight loss blog 4 or more times a week.
  • Begin editing children’s novel and submit to my writer’s group for review and revision.
  • Join SCBWI and attend one of their conferences.

Lofty, I know, but I have to set lofty goals to guilt myself into doing something about it.

Current Writing Projects

A couple of the girls in my writer’s group formed a separate group that is dedicated to personal essays and/or creative nonfiction.  I have been attending that group as well.  Because the group is small, about seven of us I think, we are much more demanding about making each other submit their work.  As a result, I have written several personal essays and semi-true short stories.  I also have many more ideas on future personal essays.  I would like to put together a collection of essays.  I am not sure if I will turn it into a book or not, but I first want to get them together and see what I have.

I plan to dedicate my next post to the book review of The Bubble Gum Thief.  I will also post my review on Amazon.

That is pretty much what I have been up to.  I hope to spend more time on this blog and sharing all of my writing ups and downs throughout the year!  Happy writing in 2013!

 

Read Full Post »


A few months ago, I submitted a short story to Glimmer Train for their “Family Issues” contest.  For this contest, I took an actual family event from my own life and I created fictional characters, changed a couple of things, and wrote a short story.  I never heard from Glimmer Train and I apparently did not win.  I was disappointed, of course, but rejection is part of the writing process.

I had my memoir writing group look at the story, but not before I had a chance to submit it to the contest.  They gave me great feedback.  They loved the dialogue, enjoyed the interaction between the two kids in the story, but they thought the emotion at the end of the story needed to have a bigger punch.  There were a couple of other comments, but pretty good feedback overall.

I then submitted it to the Arlington Writer’s Group.  I have been with AWG for a couple of  years now.  AWG is a very large writers group.  Almost 200 members, and we can get 30 people plus at any given meeting.  Receiving feedback can sometimes be overwhelming and the conversations can very easily veer off course.

We have worked very hard over the years too keep the feedback process focused and make sure people give a useful critique.  That can be a daunting task for whomever is leading the group when you have 30 or so people giving their opinions. 

I have to say, I’m very lucky with both of my writers groups.  Wonderfully thoughtful people in both groups.

So, last night I had my story critiqued by AWG.  I don’t want to describe it too much as I want to try to get te story published.  Basically, it is a story about one girl’s broken dreams.

Just like my other writers group, AWGers liked the dialogue, the interaction, between the sisters, and the story overall.  But they did pick out some major holes in my plot and made great suggestions.  I have a lot of work to do, but I think the story will be a lot better once I’m done. Then I can enter it into a couple more contests.

On another note, this is what my day has been like.  Everything I do seems to run into some kind of complication.  It’s really too bad too because I would have enjoyed discovering alternate uses for lederhosen while I wait for train schedules to appear on my screen.

Read Full Post »


I know I have not been writing much of late on this blog.  So what have I been doing with myself?

Mostly, I have been preparing for my upcoming surgery.  The surgery has consumed a lot of my time and mental thought recently.  As a result, I have been doing a lot of blogging on my other website where I discuss my pre-surgery progress and my thought, fears, and hopes for the upcoming big day.

Writing updates:

My short story did not win the Glimmertrain Family Matters contest.  Oh well.

I have started writing another short story, although I am not quite certain what it is about yet, so it is kind of hard to finish.  I had a really great idea for one scene and one other event.  I wrote the scene and the event, now I have to figure out what to do with it.

The idea for the scene has been in my head for a while, but I did not quite know what to do with it.  I did not write it down because I didn’t have a story to go with it. Now I have written the scene and I have one character at least.  If I cannot think of anything to do with it, I may just set it aside and wait for my writer’s group to have a Flaming Fragments session.

WTF is a Flaming Fragment, you ask?

Well, one of the original members of the writer’s group had this great idea for a workshop.  She called it, Fanning Fragments into Flame.  During the workshop, you share bits of a story, an idea for a story, a character that’s been stuck in our heads looking for a story, a scene with nowhere to go, whatever with the rest of the group and see if they can give you an idea or direction.  Sometimes it works.

Well, you cannot expect to put the words “flame” and “fragment” into a title and expect it to stay intact.  Plus, the originator of the session moved back to Canada.  Top that with no one could remember the very long, artistic title of the workshop, so it very quickly became “Flaming Fragments.”

So, I might just set the idea loose during one of those sessions and see if anyone has any good ideas.

The third thing I’ve done is work a little on my youth novel.  I am almost done with it.  I had some huge gaps in the plot and with the last few scenes and I was pretty stressed out about that.  I had a great idea on how to fix it.  I had an epiphany after my sister and her family subjected me to 14 hours of Doctor Who this weekend during the DC power outage.  Either that, or I just went a little crazy.  Perhaps a bit of both.

I have updated the outline and started adding to the plot in my current location.  I still have to go back and insert the idea in several other places.  Mostly, the idea will help me finish the story and bring the kids back home in a semi-believable yet fantastical way.   My original idea was a bit too boring.  If I can pull this idea off, it can be a connecting thread throughout the entire book.

I would like to get the book finished before my surgery.  The surgery will be some time in August.  After the surgery then, I can read through it and see what I need to fix.  Then the re-write process will begin.

Even though this is a kid’s novel, it has been harder to write than I thought it would be.  It’s been good though.  I really had to think through a large scale plot.  I wrote a poem the kids have to figure out.  And I wrote a song.  The poem is short, just a few lines, and it is more of a riddle than a poem.  The song is longer and actually kind of bad, right now.  I don’t imagine that it will ever be a top ten hit or even set to music, but I’d like it to be not bad.  I am going to have to have someone who writes poetry look at it to see what I can improve.  A poet, I am not.

I think the story is fun and I hope that I can do something with it once I’m through writing/editing, etc.  We shall see.

Have a Happy 4th of July!

Read Full Post »


Glimmertrain is a publication that has regular monthly contests for writers.  Each month has a theme.  April’s theme is “Family Matters.”   I have three short stories nearly ready to go for this month’s contest.  Well, OK, two that are nearly ready.  They just need a good once over for fine tuning.  The third is only half written, but I can finish it in time.  The deadline is looming, however.

The Glimmertrain deadline is April 30.  Three days, three stories to finish.  I was originally only going to submit one, but I think all three are good enough for consideration.

A bigger deadline is looming on May 1.  That is the early bird deadline for the Writer’s Digest contest.  The actual deadline is May 15.  I have a pretty good story I can submit for that one, but it needs some editing.  I don’t know if it will be ready for May 1.  It might be, but I can definitely have it ready for May 15.

I have a lot of writing work to do this weekend to get ready for these contests, but I am up for it, definitely.  Wish me luck!

Read Full Post »


Forgive Me Father for I Have Sinned

Yes, yes, I broke one of my own rules. I committed the cardinal sin of seeing a movie BEFORE I read the book. I know. The shame of it all.

The minute I could download on iTunes the movie Never Let Me Go, I did. I saw the trailer somewhere and I thought the story looked very compelling. I am also a fan of Carey Mulligan and enjoyed her acting in the movies An Education and Pride and Prejudice. Plus, it takes place in England, and since I have already expressed my deep appreciation of all things British, it was a win-win-win as far as I was concerned.

Just so you know, I do plan to discuss the plot of the story a little and the differences between the movie and the book, so if you would prefer not to know until you have had the chance to check them out yourself, stop reading now and come back to this post later.

I enjoyed the movie, even the creepy “reveal” scene where one of the teachers tells the children their true purpose in life, (more on that later).

Well, I finally read the book this week. True to form, I was not disappointed, the book was much better than the movie. Better mostly because of added depth and detail of the story, characters and their relationship to each other.

I loved the movie, but there was so much ground they did not cover, I think if I had read the book first, I may not have liked the the movie as much as I did.

Major Differences:

The first major difference was the love triangle. In the book, the love triangle is not nearly as pronounced as it was the movie. From the beginning of the movie practically, you feel an acute sense of injustice at the fact that Ruth pre-empts Kathy as Tommy’s girlfriend. Kathy is noticeably heartbroken and forever relegated to the role of third wheel.

In the book, Kathy is Tommy’s friend and does not really express romantic interest or heartbreak for much of the story. The relationship is much more complex and there is more of a slow, life-long growth towards a romantic interest than the perpetual yearnings of young unrequited love.

In both the book and the movie, Ruth betrays Kathy. In the movie, the betraying primarily revolves around Tommy. In the book, while the ultimate betrayal revolved around Tommy, Ruth’s betrayal is much more constant. Ruth is a “frienemy” in every sense of the word. She includes Kathy as one of her intimates and then later betrays her very early on. This continues throughout the story at Hailsham and the Cottages. But she also does care about Kathy, probably as much as she cares about anyone. When one of Kathy’s favorite possessions goes missing, Ruth, unbeknown to Kathy, recruits both male and female students to try to find it.

The big reveal, the astonishing plot of the both the book and the movie is that these children are clones created to donate their vital organs to keep “regular” people alive. They do not live past their mid-late 20s, although no specific age is given, and once they have made 3-4 donations, they die, or “complete” as they say in the story. The book and movie handle this very differently as well. In the movie, one of the teachers tells the children in a big dramatic scene and the children are stunned and horrified.

In the book, there is more of a slow build to this. In the book, the children always know that their job is to make donations, that is why they were created. They just aren’t told upfront what those donations will be. The reality is being revealed to them slowly a bit at a time, so it is not a huge shock when one of their teachers agonizes over whether to tell them the truth. As in the movie, she tells them, “you’re being told and not told” the truth of the purpose of your lives. So, by the time the truth is revealed to them, while the teacher struggles with the truth, the children are much more accepting. That is the horror of the book, not how stunned the kids are of their fate, but that their reaction is almost, “Yes, we know this, we will donate our vital organs until we die. You’re not telling us anything we do not already know.” That’s not to say the kids do not later try to find ways to put off their donations, or that they maybe do not dream of having a different kind of life, but they do not try to completely thwart the system.

The second big reveal comes right before the end. The kids talk about how they were trained at Hailsham to create art and write poems to “reveal their souls.” Tommy is one of the big proponents of this since he thinks it will allow the powers that be to look into his soul to show that he and Kathy are truly in love and therefore worthy of having their donations put off for a while. In both the book and the movie, it is revealed when they ask for a deferral that they were encouraged to create art not to reveal their souls, but to prove that they souls at all. To prove that they were, in fact, “all but human,” as their former teacher Miss Emily puts it. In the book it is left at that. In the movie, of course, so much more is revealed about how the clones are viewed by society as a whole and why Hailsham existed and why it ultimately closed.

One thing the movie did better than the book. The final scene where Kathy reflects on her life before she is set to begin her donations. She asks if in the end, where the lives of the donors any different than that of the people they help. She surmises, that after all, they all complete. Maybe none of them really understood the meaning of their lives or felt they had enough time. I found that insight to be touching and was noticeably absent from the book.

Obviously, I enjoyed the book so much more than the movie. I still enjoyed the movie, and I’m very glad that I downloaded it. This book, however, had so much depth and consequence, that I think you cannot get away with just watching the movie. I highly recommend both.

Read Full Post »


So, I’ve been thinking of a blog post for today.  I have not really wanted to look at the computer anymore and had nearly given up on posting today.

Luckily, a friend from my writer’s group shared some very exciting news with me tonight!

His name is Jeff Miller and his book, The Bubble Gum Thief is being published.  I do not know the exact date, but you can already pre-order it Amazon.  This is excellent news!  Jeff has been working very hard to get this published for at least a year or two.  I am so happy for him.

Since we are in the same writer’s group, I have had the pleasure to read a chapter, maybe more of this book.  I love it and cannot wait to read the rest.  This book is a police mystery/thriller, and no, it’s not about a guy who steals bubble gum.  I do not normally delve into that genre, but I enjoy reading Jeff’s work.  I have read a screen play by him, a chapter of this book, a poem he spontaneously wrote at an AWG meeting, just to name a few things.  His writing is prolific, effortless, engaging, creative, and thoughtful.  I enjoy reading his work and I’m sure you will too.

I know I cannot wait to read the book when his publishers finally release it.  Please check out his website and check out his book!  I will add and update once a full release date is announced.  

I fully predict this book will be hot and sell millions.  I will write a review of the book after I read it.  I also promise to follow up with a review of the movie that will obviously follow and will truly lament all of the wonderful scenes they leave out!

Good luck Jeff!

Read Full Post »


I have to start this review with a bit of a confession.  I had placed this book on my ‘not-to-be-read-under-any-circumstances’  list  because I thought it was yet another vampire book.  I am not really a fan of the whole vampire genre.  See, when I was a teen, vampires were, well…scary.  They could be seductive, but only as a means to lure you in so they could kill you.  Vampires were not true romantic interests.  They were deadly.  To be feared and vanquished.  preferably with a swift, sharp stake in the heart followed immediately by decapitation.

The reason Buffy the Vampire Slayer was terrific (the movie, not the series) was because she killed vampires.  But this is also the point at which vampires started becoming romanticized. 

No wait, I’m wrong…Bram Stoker beat Buffy to it about a century earlier.  But even he had the sense to have his heroin’s love for the Dracula cure him of his vampirism before his death and thus allow him to attain salvation.  Buffy’s edge, she was  funnier, cooler, and had a keener fashion sense while kicking butt.

Since the movie  Bram Stoker’s Dracula, I have done my level best to avoid all vampire movies.  Well, except for that one time my sister tricked me into watching Dusk Til Dawn, which she promised me was definitely not a vampire movie.  I believed her.  Then  they get to the bar and some woman was dancing on a table.  That’s when my sister says to me, “Oh by the way, I lied.  This is a vampire movie.”   It was horrible.

Then Twilight happened.  And Edward happened.  Suddenly, vampires are  boyfriends.  I did read the Twilight series and see all of the movies.  I thought the Twilight series was OK, but I really still have a hard time thinking of Edward as an appropriate boyfriend.  And Bella wanting to become a vampire?  Um, no. 

A couple of weeks ago my teenage step-niece forced me to watch the trailer for the movie The Hunger Games at the same time letting me know she absolutely had  to see this movie and would I please, please, please take her to see it if her parents wouldn’t.  Yeah, I’m that kind of aunt. 

So, I rolled my eyes and prepared myself and watched the trailer.  When it was over, I was confused.  I said, “I thought this was about Vampires.”

Of course she looked at me like I was nuts and responded, “Duh, no, why would you think that?”

Well, because in my crazy adult mind, I was thinking Hunger = Hunger for Blood = Vampires.  Silly me.

Knowing that The Hunger Games had nothing to do with vampires increased by a factor of ten at least the likelihood I would read the book and see the movie.  So, I had her play the trailer again and I decided I needed to investigate this book further. Yes, of course I wanted to see the movie.   And since I have already established the “read the book before you see the movie” rule, I read the book.  Saturday, in fact.  I finished the second book yesterday and already have th third one on my kindle app.

Review:

I loved it.  I read the first two in one day each, which says a lot.  I love reading.  I consider myself and avid reader.  I am just a slow reader, so I do not put myself into the category of voracious reader.  For me to read a book in one day is a pretty big deal. 

The story was riveting enough to hold my attention and make me ignore all the shiny things the world has to offer, (TV, video games, the internet, etc)  The characters were believable and sympathetic.  The plot was creative and original.  The conclusion was difficult to sum up in one or two words.  Suzanne Collins masterfully gives you the ending you want, but still leaves you feeling that everything is still all wrong.  Kind of like in Stephen King’s the Stand.  The climax of the book has the “good” people destroying all of the “evil” people.  Yet at the end of the book, the citizens of the new society start locking their doors and distrusting one another. 

********Warning!  Spoiler Alert********

I am not going to give a summary of the book’s plot.  Many other sites do a much better, more succinct job than I could.  I want to talk about a couple of themes that spoke to me in the book.  This may have the effect of giving away some of the plot, so if you haven’t read the book or just want to see the movie, stop reading now.

Social Commentary:

The book is so much more than a young adult novel.  This book is a solid work of social commentary.  It is about as much a young adult novel as Lord of the Flies, The Crucible, and Animal Farm, which I read in 8th, 9th and 10th grade.  This only increases my respect for this book.  I do not know that the author meant it as social commentary, but it is.  The book critiques our obsession with reality TV, living in a war-like society, the control imposed by a dictatorial government, class warfare, and fear.

Control:

The Capitol city of Panem controls its citizens several ways, not the least of which is the Hunger Games themselves.  Travel is not permitted between districts, so residents never have a chance to get to know anything about their fellow countrymen.  The only thing they know about the people in the other districts is what service they provide.  District 12, Katniss Everdeen’s district, is known for coal mining.  Katniss’s ally Rue is from district 11, which produces fruits.  The only way anyone ever gets to know people from other areas of the country is during the Hunger Games, where the children of each district meet and then prepare to kill one another.  The only thing anyone ever really learns about other districts is what the region produces.  They know little about he people or how the districts’ local governments are administered.  This keeps the citizens divided, unable to organize an effective revolt, distrustful of each other, and fearful.

Class Warfare:

Class and economic disparity are a constant theme throughout the books.  Katniss Everdeen comes from the poorest neighborhood (the Seam) from the poorest of the twelve districts and lives in constant fear of death either by starvation or illness.  Katniss talks a lot in the book about how other people in her district have more than the people in the Seam as well as how much more the citizens from the richer districts have.  But that all changes when she gets to the capitol city and sees where the real wealth lies.  Through the games and her experiences int he capitol, we learn that all of the districts are under the thumb of the capitol city.  She learns of the real economic hardships of those she thinks have  so much more than her.  The family of her friend Peeta for example, own a bakery.  She assumes they are much more well-fed than the people from the Seam.  But Peeta let’s her know that even they cannot eat most of the bread and pastries they make.  From Rue, she learns that the people in her district are not allowed to eat the fruit they pick.  All of the districts exist to supply goods to support the lavish lifestyles of the Capitol.

Reality TV and War as Theatre:

Seems beyond belief that anyone would accept sending kids to fight and die every year in a reality tv show that everyone is forced to watch and cheer for.  Almost unreal that any society would be so masochistic and cruel.  Then I think of all of the reality shows that we watch.  We watch people destroy each other emotionally.  A chance at a modeling career, music contract to live with a group of people they don’t know or care about for eight weeks.  They eat disgusting food, live in unbearable conditions, form alliances, betray one another, and ruthlessly fight over money.  This is our entertainment.  That doesn’t even include what we watched at the height of the past two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  I clearly remember at the beginning of the Iraq war, the war was on 24/7.  Huge bombs and explosions went off day and night and the news was happy to report every moment of it.  At least Panem asked for new children each year.  Some of the military personnel serving have been re-deployed so many times they have been fighting in war for about a decade.  In the books, Katniss really breaks down from her experience in the arena.  It changes her and makes her a different person with a vastly different view of the world.  In a way, part of her will never leave the Hunger Games.  I cannot imagine her experience let alone being a young person in my late 20s or early 30s deployed to war zones for a third of my life.

Rage Against the Machine:

One word, defiance.  What teenager doesn’t relish being defiant.  Katniss is a strong, defiant young woman.  At first she does not know this herself, but it is apparent in every part of her being.  She refused to starve and flouted the rules of District 12 to survive.  She escapes beyond the fence every day to hunt, fish, and gather food for her family.  She will not let her sister participate in the Hunger Games and volunteers to take her place.  When Rue is killed, she openly mourns the loss on TV instead of celebrating the death of an opponent.  In her farewell salute to Rue she openly thumbs her nose to the powers that be.  Most importantly, she refused to let the Game Keepers have their way at the end of the first book when she and her friend Peeta, the last two survivors threaten suicide rather than fight each other. 

Love and the Courage to Hope:

Katniss’s actions come from a place of courage and love as much as it does from being defiant.  Everything from Katniss does, from hunting to standing in for her sister, shows this.  She helps Peeta because of the love of the people in his district, if not for Peeta himself.  Peeta did declare his love for Katniss just before the games started.  She was never sure if he was being truthful or if it was all a ploy for the cameras.  She was convinced he meant to kill her in the end.  But through the course of the games they fight for each other to save one another.  She played up the romance, even though she was never sure if it was a true romance, to help them both live.  In the end, their pact to eat poisonous berries to deny the Capitol their champion, paid off and they were both declared winners. 

Like I said, the book has the ending you want.  You cheer the main characters on.  You want both Katniss and Peeta to win.  It breaks your heart to think that Katniss and Peeta might have to fight each other to the death.  Both of them survive, but you’re still left feeling sullied for having even participated. 

I’m currently reading the third book and I’m going to see the movie tonight.  I promise a full review of the movie this weekend.

Read Full Post »


Did that make you cringe?  Yeah, me too.

With Emmy-Oscar season upon us, I have been thinking a great deal about my love of movies, which often leads to thinking about my love of books.

I love to read.  I’m not a fast reader, nor would I qualify myself as a voracious reader.  But I feel comfortable saying that I probably read more than the average bear.

I also love the movies.  I do not limit myself there either.  I love the sappy rom-com as much I love heady, intellectual documentary or biopic.  I crowd into theaters with the masses to watch the big summer block-busters as quickly as I do to see the latest Oscar contender.

For me, reading books and watching movies are not necessarily mutually exclusive activities.  As any Twi-hard Potter-maniac will tell you, seeing the movie is simply the natural extension of reading the book.  I love having  stories and characters from books brought to life through movies.  Yes, there are always disappointments, the second Bridget Jones movie for example. But then movies such as Lord of the Rings are a wonder to behold.

So, imagine my horror when a friend said to me, “There’s no point in reading Lord of the Rings, there’s a movie now.  Besides, the books are too long anyway.”

My answer:  Read the book(s).  The book is always better than the movie.  I have never come across an instance where the movie was better than the book.  Never once.  Furthermore, reading  opens the creative center of the brain, forcing you to imagine the scenes and people in the stories.  Movies are fun, yes, but watching a movie lacks the interaction the reader has with the story and the author.

I also find that many movies based on books are not true to the book.  Plots are sometimes changed, characters changed or several characters are merged.

The problem with making a book into a movie is often time.  Movies cannot plod along plot points, description and dialogue, certainly not in a 90 minute period.  Fortunately, movies have many more devices to tell a story available to them that books do not.  Movies can use music and imagery to tell a story in a way text cannot convey.  I can forgive losing a character or a plot point if the story is told creatively or told in an interesting manner.

Let me give you two examples from two movies that I love.

Lord of the Rings:

The Lord of the Rings trilogy I think was brilliantly portrayed in the movie as written and directed by Peter Jackson.  Yes, some of the story was changed, but I thought he did a great job of distilling the main point of the movie down into an enjoyable movie experience.

One of the things I most enjoyed was how he used imagery to tell the story.  In the second movie, LOTR The Two Towers, the story begins with Gandalf falling in Khazad Dum to what is assumed his death.  There we find out that he fell, but did not die.  He fought the Belroq monster until he hits the water.  At which point, Frodo awakens from a dream.  Later in the movie, Strider, Legolas and Gimli meet Gandalf in the forest and then we learn the rest of the story, told partly through dialogue and partly through imagery.

In the book, the reader does not have any inclination that Gandolf will return until about almost the halfway point when Strider, Legolas and Gimli meet him in the forest.  He then explains in great detail what happened to him in Khazad Dum and beyond.

Here’s the problem…who has time for a 15-20 minute monologue in a movie?  The Lord of the Rings movies are already 2 1/2 to 3 hours long.

I love how Jackson handled that.  His use of imagery and dialogue did three things for me in this instance.

  • He dropped a hint that Gandalf was returning to the story.
  • His use of imagery – dream sequence at the begining of the movie connected it to the first movie reminding everyone about where we left off.
  • He condensed the monologue from the book into a 1 minute conversation that told Gandalf’s tale quickly to move the story along.

The Age of Innocence

I’ll start with this movie by stating the obvious, Martin Scorsese is a genius.  Of course, one expects someone to say that when refering to some of his other heavy hitting movies such as Goodfellas or Raging Bull or Taxi Driver.  All excellent movies without question.  The Age of Innocence, however, is one of my favorite book-to-movie adaptations.

First off, the adaptation from book-to-movie is the best I have ever seen.  To my recollection, Scorsese left out one character and kind of merged her with another character.  Then he glossed over the wedding and wedding breakfast scenes from the book.  Not crucial scenes in my opinion.

His use of imagery and voice over were just genius.  He brought to life the early 20th century with his use of color, scenery and costume.   His use of voice over captured the conservative sense of conformity and rigidity in the higher archical society that was turn of the century New York City.

He did what many film makers have tried to do for decades.  He took a piece of literature and successfully translated it from book to screen.

So, why read the book?  You tell me.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers